... | ... | @@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ The six participants to the affinity mapping session got together on the 26th of |
|
|
* Copy / cut sentences from the interview transcript and group them in categories
|
|
|
* Stick the result on a large glass surface
|
|
|
|
|
|
When all interviews were analyzed in this way, all participants got together and presented the groups of sentences they created, explaining why it made sense to them. When commonalities were discovered between groups, they were discussed, merged or renamed. In the end about twenty groups remained and there was an agreement that five of them were the most important one, the "emerging themes":
|
|
|
When all interviews were analyzed in this way, all participants got together and presented the groups of sentences they created, explaining why it made sense to them. When commonalities were discovered between groups, they were discussed, merged or renamed. In the end about twenty groups remained and there was an agreement that five of them were the most important one:
|
|
|
|
|
|
* The forge ecosystem
|
|
|
* The scope of a software project
|
... | ... | @@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ When all interviews were analyzed in this way, all participants got together and |
|
|
|
|
|
### Writing the report
|
|
|
|
|
|
The report is an explanation of the "emerging themes" that re-uses the sentences extracted from the interviews and put them in context. It does not reflect the full diversity of what the interviewees said: it only focuses on these themes.
|
|
|
The report is an explanation of the five groups identified during the affinity mapping by re-using the sentences extracted from the interviews to put them in context. It does not reflect the full diversity of what the interviewees said: it only focuses on these five groups.
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Report
|
|
|
|
... | ... | |